Basically they're clinging to IW and milking CoD4. Treyarch has also overhauled call of duty black ops 3s multiplayer substantially while still keeping the core of the game familiar to returning players. Our love for CoD4 has demoralized Treyarch into finding every last d!ck in the universe to suck since all they're doing now is trying to clone CoD4 using a WW2 setting. The latest COD game (Black Ops 3) has evolved the series by adding new movement mechanics, weapons, perks and scorestreaks. I love CoD4 to death, and i'd love to play more of it, but it's a bit unfair when games like Vegas 2 or Brothers in Arms 2 get crucified for being too much like their predecessors, when this one is all like "OMG they aDDED pERKS agaIN W00t LOL!!!!!!" I completely understand reusing the idea of perks since they were so successful, but shouldn't we expect Treyarch to come up with a bit more than just 5 of their own? What's next, am I going to have to be a brigadier general just to unlock a government-issue m1 carbine? Seriously, how is Treyarch getting away with making a carbon-copy of CoD4? Since when was paying $60 for the same game with new skins acceptable?
0 kommentar(er)
